The first time I looked at Conviviality Near the Inn, all I saw were the peasants, dancing and hawking wares. The second time I looked, the more to me it seemed the castle (or church) dominated half the painting, not just in composition, but in meaning.
Constantijn van Renesse was a student of Rembrandt’s in the late 1640s and early 1650s. There’s an article here about a painting โ The Descent from the Cross (1650/52) โ which was once attributed to Rembrandt, but is now attributed to van Renesse.
Interestingly, van Renesse, whose father was a theologian and minister, mostly painted religious scenes. For example, here’s his The Judgement of Solomon (1649/50), and The Fall of Man (c.1650). So, what’s really happening here at the inn? In my opinion, a lot depends on whether the building on the left is interpreted as a castle or a church.
More of my ekphrastic poetry here. More on the dansa form here.
Conviviality Near the Inn
in a world divided
lords in the castle feasted on marzipan
peasants drank warm beer at the inn
their lives like farms subdivided
in a world divided
dog, innkeeper, woman, man
ate bread, beans, roots, not marzipan
a stumbled dance with a fiddle provided
respite in a world divided
the lords judged and policed the land
gambling distracted the common man
blood kept all the wealth one-sided
stasis in a world divided
ยฉelsp 2026
Leave a Reply